lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uri Boness (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1649) Refactor all ResponseWriters to be more extension-friendly
Date Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:21:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789884#action_12789884
] 

Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1649:
----------------------------------

I think the class hierarchy needs to change. see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1123?focusedCommentId=12711133&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12711133

> Refactor all ResponseWriters to be more extension-friendly
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1649
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1649
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Response Writers
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>         Environment: My local MacBook pro over the Christmas break.
>            Reporter: Chris A. Mattmann
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> I'd like to refactor all the ResponseWriters to be a bit less brittle. ResponseWriters
should follow a standard interface with more existing methods than is currently present in
the interface, and with lots of refactored utility code and more concrete control/data flow.
I'll take a hard look at the existing response writers and try to generalize.
> See this thread for background:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/e8bb6cac84c1f520/namespaces_in_response_solr_1586#cc50ba9e9d8fe2dc

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message