lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1298) FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
Date Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:20:29 GMT


Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1298:

{quote}fl=foo is ambiguous... do we mean a function query or the field?... perhaps if it's
a bare field name, then we treat it as a field unless it has localparams?

It is and isn't ambiguous, right?  The result should be the same in that the value for that
field is loaded (although I suppose it has implications that it would now be possible to load
non-stored, single valued fields if we treat it as a function).  FWIW, for the sort by function
case, I checked to see if it is a field first, then a function, then puke.

> FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
> --------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-1298
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5
>         Attachments: SOLR-1298-FieldValues.patch, SOLR-1298.patch
> It would be helpful if the results of FunctionQueries could be added as fields to a document.

> Couple of options here:
> 1. Run FunctionQuery as part of relevance score and add that piece to the document
> 2. Run the function (not really a query) during Document/Field retrieval

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message