lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kay Kay (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1212) TestNG Test Case
Date Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:37:29 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795118#action_12795118
] 

Kay Kay commented on SOLR-1212:
-------------------------------

Keeping this out of the codebase would result in the patch being out of sync with the tree.
If there were no licensing restrictions - what is the harm in having this in the tree. 

> TestNG Test Case 
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1212
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1212
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: clients - java
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>         Environment: Java 6
>            Reporter: Kay Kay
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-1212.patch, testng-5.9-jdk15.jar
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> TestNG equivalent of AbstractSolrTestCase , without using JUnit altogether . 
> New Class created: AbstractSolrNGTest 
> LICENSE.txt , NOTICE.txt modified as appropriate. ( TestNG under Apache License 2.0 )

> TestNG 5.9-jdk15 added to lib. 
> Justification:  In some workplaces - people are moving towards TestNG and take out JUnit
altogether from the classpath. Hence useful in those cases.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message