lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1298) FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
Date Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:17:29 GMT


Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1298:

Both Chris and me are trying to achieve more or less the same thing. just that SOLR-1566 is
a bit more ambitious in scope.

@Uri , I would request you to take a look at the patch in SOLR-1566 also . 

I guess, all of us agree upon the fact that  we need a generic way to add non-Lucene fields
to a SolrDocument . The fields could be single-valued/multivalued . Say a function returns
a List<int> should be valid too.(I even say it could even be a NamedList) . This is
useful for a lot of usecases. 

As long as we can achieve this functionality in a performant way, it is fine. Let us converge
our efforts and bring this to a resolution ASAP.  

> FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
> --------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-1298
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5
>         Attachments: SOLR-1298-FieldValues.patch, SOLR-1298.patch
> It would be helpful if the results of FunctionQueries could be added as fields to a document.

> Couple of options here:
> 1. Run FunctionQuery as part of relevance score and add that piece to the document
> 2. Run the function (not really a query) during Document/Field retrieval

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message