lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1298) FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
Date Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:11:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789909#action_12789909
] 

Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1298:
----------------------------------

bq.perhaps even put it in a separate "meta-data" section under the document

This has been discussed earlier. The meta section is not a clean idea. We should put them
as normal fields. 

Instead of inventing a new syntax , let us use the local params syntax. we do not have to
try to have any  similarity with SQL .

> FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1298
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-1298-FieldValues.patch, SOLR-1298.patch
>
>
> It would be helpful if the results of FunctionQueries could be added as fields to a document.

> Couple of options here:
> 1. Run FunctionQuery as part of relevance score and add that piece to the document
> 2. Run the function (not really a query) during Document/Field retrieval

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message