Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75335 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2009 22:37:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 22:37:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 38219 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 22:37:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 38138 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 22:37:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 38127 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2009 22:37:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:37:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kaykay.unique@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.221] (HELO mail-ew0-f221.google.com) (209.85.219.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:37:02 +0000 Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so2385853ewy.5 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:36:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g6NaSULsXIHljVjHaaJ0xyM1WI9sRK1gbhQYABfj9xE=; b=rp/LRNHhGWo7Ogpgv8we4sb8NS9VvHN38p2AFZl7TJfaXBA7/jHbCysCltqS9LVYMw ct1dgn/jPkdgo63v5b8+ZOsZyZjELEveSE9/34GSKYRZisaV6LM8UHeEVgj+4KN6b91g SHfuH5f1pEXGodNreYms91fVRJHCOF8MH4l0A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oC9DFhSa9UAp1dTMXZugvsHYbFtJUCweCk+bsHtr91jjj1HB65Oev4ZmoNrKkJlcAq YgNKkgkjpg1u40NDBJeW8aMXH+ak1B68K3NIse28zDZq9kFXlGPgtUdIn0NIoxuTkmYR c4JX21gef0vdFfjlMQwMfmCtZFcr4lhlN2dNw= Received: by 10.213.23.207 with SMTP id s15mr5372487ebb.57.1259015801916; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from KayKayVoldeMort.local ([38.99.42.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm39065ewy.0.2009.11.23.14.36.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:36:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B0B0E80.4090206@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:36:48 -0800 From: Kay Kay User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 1.5 or 2.0? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Grant Ingersoll wrote: > On Nov 19, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > >> What should the next version of Solr be? >> >> Options: >> >> - have a Solr 2.0 with a lucene 3.x >> > > +1. This gives us a chance to remove some deprecated stuff, too. > > > What would be the current development branch of Solr 2.0 , if that were branched already that is ?