Return-Path: 
 <solr-dev-return-21341-apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 31692 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 05:31:41 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 05:31:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 10812 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 05:31:40 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 10727 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 05:31:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:solr-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:solr-dev@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 10715 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 05:31:40 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:31:40 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryantxu@gmail.com designates
 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:31:30 +0000
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so374861qwd.53
        for <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org>;
 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :subject:date:references:x-mailer;
        bh=uFJBPhpTaQMIa9AnqVPHA1yxIMBSlFU5L66Z5zo1/0M=;
        b=N+3P+BaaXqoLVNIbhOnvJrVAnQGkZR/UfDCBeJW5J38FKzqS2KPlYjSzx+WqrYd+xl
         WRTy8H3DXPvDK/14e2vanAPL/je5AnBeyJdjMjWqj+er9nW0guX5wiRDx2eFNEmTvOJf
         3UarXPPnsvpFtp/Ev3JYCiZAW5ncUxxvrNZgw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :x-mailer;
        b=cj+vZ5gEnME9sSuvKlFWR9DrbnZgN5zwx+9Vae6TjfsBWQKq0BhbryKue05LaJXen0
         2T+FY/8KBg7uwfih3BLeIW80WMdn4Q50Q9Oe40PT3gMRYx0tzZhes76cXbHsm+gJk6T0
         /bb8DcNkqc+LOkUgE9g9AbQgPCwpg4OMEtYH0=
Received: by 10.224.29.203 with SMTP id r11mr9751637qac.110.1256794269614;
        Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.6? ([66.92.161.165])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm1074387qyk.3.2009.10.28.22.31.08
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <FA5A3822-99CF-4328-B3CD-54964A1CC6B5@gmail.com>
From: Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <C70E39F2.18F7%nickl@trulia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:31:08 -0400
References: <C70E39F2.18F7%nickl@trulia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Nicholas Letourneau wrote:

> Not sure who gets a vote,

Everyone gets to vote -- officially some votes are 'binding' but in  
practice this does not really matter.

The more feedback there is, the more confidence we have that things  
are good (or need fixed)



> and this is my first message to this list, but I
> wanted to add that I deployed the maven artifacts (along with the  
> lucene
> 2.9.1 ones) to my in house maven repository and successfully built  
> all my
> solr dependant projects with
>
>    <dependency>
>      <groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId>
>      <artifactId>solr-core</artifactId>
>      <version>1.4.0</version>
>    </dependency>
>    <dependency>
>      <groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId>
>      <artifactId>solr-solrj</artifactId>
>      <version>1.4.0</version>
>    </dependency>
>
> Everything went swimingly and running "mvn dependency:tree" showed  
> this
> output:
>
> [INFO] +- org.apache.solr:solr-core:jar:1.4.0:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] |  |  \- org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-highlighter:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-queries:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-snowball:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-memory:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-misc:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-spellchecker:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- commons-codec:commons-codec:jar:1.3:compile
> [INFO] |  +- commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload:jar:1.2.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.solr:solr-commons-csv:jar:1.4.0:compile
> [INFO] |  +- woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile
> [INFO] |  \-
> org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:jar:1.0.1:compile
> [INFO] \- org.apache.solr:solr-solrj:jar:1.4.0:compile
> [INFO]    +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.5:compile
> [INFO]    \- org.codehaus.woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile
> [INFO]       \- stax:stax-api:jar:1.0.1:compile
>
> Nicholas Letourneau
>
> On 10/27/09 10/27 7:07 PM, "Grant Ingersoll" <gsingers@apache.org>  
> wrote:
>
>> OK, new artifacts are up.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> : By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs.  I think we can live
>>> with them.
>>>
>>> I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on  
>>> your
>>> commit you were in the process of doing a new one.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Hoss
>>>
>>
>