Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96641 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2009 13:14:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2009 13:14:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 37255 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 13:14:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 37211 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 13:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 37201 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 13:14:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:14:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shalinmangar@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:13:51 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so523291qwd.53 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:13:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qmXlf1LTrACQDrtvFkT6x1qy/iGb/Ejb2d6yRFl+x8I=; b=Z6ISofDwSEwmD0juWuVjUUM+rcGx1oEYm4oGk2oOtSzhzd90xlszKOZGrTrXJJxt9u 6llfGCVw1w1+SthaVl1y1fDJbEpRTDctBFsdAPAQz1s5rogkMA+Mcqp0J7N+JDCFp4LY 7NoITPO6DkO6/iSI12Gp6RjgCTytkDZJCOiA8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=knnV5CMDZ6UJVnxeRXPJ/K0B/iNCblZol3kgHGxVt6LTZJDH+yEbfaI9T8fnNe8wIr 6bRUng5uq7XrWY80P2VCCrg9/xUL/fzlOm5U/6JX1ppwSdK5agFClnekgXYxcoDGxoFf pylpyCA+Qq+h1u4rDwa56HAyIZXp0i9m7rjlQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.1.136 with SMTP id 8mr1420835qcf.1.1255094010382; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:13:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ACF2EDB.7010809@r.email.ne.jp> References: <4E7772C0-7099-4584-9695-C9F2651B5548@apache.org> <69de18140910082324o1a2b0b23he7f7510ae46d5f0f@mail.gmail.com> <4ACF2EDB.7010809@r.email.ne.jp> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:43:30 +0530 Message-ID: <69de18140910090613w5bce18d8md2d8fa1e631151ca@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Down to 5 From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367d5656a60ad204758058d4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367d5656a60ad204758058d4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Hi Shalin, > > > What about FastVectorHighlighter? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > > If we're targeting RC in this week, I'd like to push it to 1.5 > because there is no patches. But perhaps you think > 13 votes is considerable? > > No, that is fine. We can push it to 1.5 unless it is very easy to make it work with Solr. It affects relatively few number of people. The applications mentioned in the comments (Blacklight etc) can choose to release with patched Solr versions I guess. The only common case which needs this feature is highlighting n-gram fields (for auto-complete). -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. --0016367d5656a60ad204758058d4--