Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90933 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2009 00:46:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2009 00:46:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 90392 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2009 00:46:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 90314 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2009 00:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 90304 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2009 00:46:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:46:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.83] (HELO homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:46:27 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.77] (adsl-065-013-152-164.sip.rdu.bellsouth.net [65.13.152.164]) by homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D54A9604061 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Subject: Re: svn commit: r830013 - in /lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4: common-build.xml src/maven/solr-core-pom.xml.template From: Grant Ingersoll In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:46:06 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <4FC2273E-B1C5-4E7E-9781-F16F73C3D5D5@apache.org> References: <20091026230338.1130C23888D1@eris.apache.org> <9602CA45-CF01-4ADF-B0A4-14CAFEB0C946@apache.org> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Grant Ingersoll > wrote: >> Not following... > > I just updated the default version to 1.4.1-dev on the branch. > I really don't know what maven_version should be set to... I guess we > can leave it at 1.4.0 for now. Yeah, that is fine. I still don't get your 2.9.1-dev comment. Was that in relation to the Maven stuff or the common-build.xml stuff? FWIW, I think we are fine with the Maven stuff. > >> This gets a little tricky w/ the Maven stuff b/c we want >> it to point to the value that is actually released, which will be >> 2.9.1 in >> the pom. So, it won't work until Lucene is actually published, >> unfortunately. > > We're not actually releasing before Lucene though... what doesn't > work? > "ant package" seems to work fine... I was referring to the Maven stuff that refers to the Lucene 2.9.1 POM. Thus, if someone were try to resolve the POMs now, it would fail, but they will pass by the time Solr is actually released, thus I am not worried, but someone might run into a problem in the meantime w/ it.