lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Letourneau <ni...@trulia.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Date Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:12:02 GMT
Not sure who gets a vote, and this is my first message to this list, but I
wanted to add that I deployed the maven artifacts (along with the lucene
2.9.1 ones) to my in house maven repository and successfully built all my
solr dependant projects with

    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId>
      <artifactId>solr-core</artifactId>
      <version>1.4.0</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId>
      <artifactId>solr-solrj</artifactId>
      <version>1.4.0</version>
    </dependency>

Everything went swimingly and running "mvn dependency:tree" showed this
output:

[INFO] +- org.apache.solr:solr-core:jar:1.4.0:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] |  |  \- org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-highlighter:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-queries:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-snowball:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-memory:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-misc:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-spellchecker:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] |  +- commons-codec:commons-codec:jar:1.3:compile
[INFO] |  +- commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload:jar:1.2.1:compile
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.solr:solr-commons-csv:jar:1.4.0:compile
[INFO] |  +- woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile
[INFO] |  \- 
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:jar:1.0.1:compile
[INFO] \- org.apache.solr:solr-solrj:jar:1.4.0:compile
[INFO]    +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.5:compile
[INFO]    \- org.codehaus.woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile
[INFO]       \- stax:stax-api:jar:1.0.1:compile

Nicholas Letourneau

On 10/27/09 10/27 7:07 PM, "Grant Ingersoll" <gsingers@apache.org> wrote:

> OK, new artifacts are up.
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> 
>> 
>> : By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs.  I think we can live
>> with them.
>> 
>> I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on your
>> commit you were in the process of doing a new one.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Hoss
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message