lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Au <bill.w...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Another RC
Date Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:22:26 GMT
+1 on the Solr 1.4 voting process being parallel to that of Lucene 2.9.1.

Bill

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley <yonik@lucidimagination.com>wrote:

> OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC
> is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can
> do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has
> really been held up long enough :-)
>
> We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote
> doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote
> fails).
>
> Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any
> potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the
> official vote.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood <wunder@wunderwood.org>
> wrote:
> > Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much
> easier
> > when you need to dig into the Lucene code.
> >
> > It is well worth a week delay.
> >
> > wunder
> >
> > On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are we ready for a release?
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes
> >> in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet
> >> another week.
> >>
> >> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the
> >> version, immediately call a VOTE).
> >>
> >> -Yonik
> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com
> >>
> >>>  I got busy at work and haven't been able to
> >>> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing.
> >>>
> >>> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1?  If we
> go
> >>> w/
> >>> the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them.
> >>>  Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely
> removed
> >>> so
> >>> as to make it a little easier to restore.
> >>>
> >>> -Grant
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message