lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1483) Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
Date Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:01:36 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763264#action_12763264
] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1483:
---------------------------------------------

bq. The doubling fieldCache behavior for sortMissingLast with pint isn't new, so that part
at least should still work as it did before.

Fine. I'll remove the p-types and commit the other changes (which aren't many). The doubling
memory issue for p-types should still be noted somewhere though. Should I remove pdate too
(which already existed in that note)?

> Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1483
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-1483.patch, SOLR-1483.patch, SOLR-1483.patch
>
>
> Example schema defines int (TrieIntField), tint (TrieIntField) and pint (IntField) which
is confusing. In particular, the comments for int fields tell users to use tint types (which
is the same thing).
> Let us remove tint, tlong, tdouble, tdate types from example schemas and fix the comments
- carefully noting the things trie fields do not work with.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message