lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1483) Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
Date Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:30:31 GMT


Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1483:

I think the patch is way to verbose...
Solr is growing up - we shouldn't have a numeric field and say "hey, it supports sorting as
a feature!"  Wouldn't one expect you could do sorting, range queries, faceting, function queries,
etc?  We should really only need to call out what doesn't work.

I also don't see why we want to call out that Trie fields are new in the schema - seems like
more noise.

I'll try and revisit / review your other points (#4 and #5) soon.

> Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-1483
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>             Fix For: 1.4
>         Attachments: SOLR-1483.patch
> Example schema defines int (TrieIntField), tint (TrieIntField) and pint (IntField) which
is confusing. In particular, the comments for int fields tell users to use tint types (which
is the same thing).
> Let us remove tint, tlong, tdouble, tdate types from example schemas and fix the comments
- carefully noting the things trie fields do not work with.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message