lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1483) Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
Date Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:18:31 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762238#action_12762238
] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1483:
---------------------------------------------

bq. On changing the precisionSteps... it feels like working in the dark a bit... I still haven't
seen any good analysis on the size penalty that goes along with the performance increase.

I agree. Anyways, it is not related to this issue.

Should I commit this patch? Anything that needs to be added or clarified?

> Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1483
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-1483.patch
>
>
> Example schema defines int (TrieIntField), tint (TrieIntField) and pint (IntField) which
is confusing. In particular, the comments for int fields tell users to use tint types (which
is the same thing).
> Let us remove tint, tlong, tdouble, tdate types from example schemas and fix the comments
- carefully noting the things trie fields do not work with.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message