Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51193 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 00:09:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 00:09:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 44033 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 00:09:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43966 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 00:09:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43956 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 00:09:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:09:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bill.w.au@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:09:26 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1683631qwi.53 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:09:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3lfl7OtWuUaCLIJtEwxfGS2NaOTMPGkvdBgi08qBm/U=; b=KHHN7+7rTkygc0KGiGdEWjxLvIRztTlhaP+jpThGky7nj2ZgrguXv72+G7BuWlkAIJ CJHg9y5vS4OvCKPwfAdBl+dbvjV++Yq7N/jC2pHOG08IFsn6NF6XE9tjsCBOOVvVdS4o 2bOEJJRlAYCuSw3tGJLosDB5uBQFnNYUq3QgA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kOtmu+sSZBuKhB4cIFExPyd18JA7PSYmrucSy/408ommwm7XJ/AFG5O4evFFFKrm17 uLwyvs8QT/ZBFd/I8InwlSVh2kWLqFMUC/9e4nUTQo8gzaqzZHfTrEuHho+MBd1cHNbk kuYhMT7Hz3A6EHaCfI3Ycj+ZpGst26zWqh9Ws= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.31.211 with SMTP id z19mr1543382qcc.24.1254182946131; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:09:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80066AEF1866184096F7C635390FDCCC01DEAF60BC@USSDIXMSG11.am.sony.com> References: <80066AEF1866184096F7C635390FDCCC01DEAF60BC@USSDIXMSG11.am.sony.com> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:09:06 -0400 Message-ID: <3b5f72030909281709v54601efag4ac515ccdc0a447b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Solr Slave Sync Pulling Snapshot Issue From: Bill Au To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364eeba8fcd0de0474ac382d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364eeba8fcd0de0474ac382d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Solr's script based replication cannot handle more than one snapshot per second. Do you really need to take more than one snapshot per second? Bill On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Zhao, Jing Jing < JingJing.Zhao@smss.sony.com> wrote: > Does anyone know this issue? > Thanks! > > From: Zhao, Jing Jing > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:25 PM > To: 'solr-dev@lucene.apache.org' > Subject: Solr Slave Sync Pulling Snapshot Issue > > Hi, Solr Developers, > > We are experiencing the following issue. When Solr Master makes more than > one commit within the same second of the clock, the Solr Slave snap puller > does not pull the latest snapshot from Solr Master. > > Can anyone advice if this is a known issue or I should submit this as a > bug? > > Thanks! > Jing Jing Zhao > > > --0016364eeba8fcd0de0474ac382d--