Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91438 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 01:47:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 01:47:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 25231 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 01:47:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 25141 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 01:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 25124 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 01:47:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:47:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryantxu@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.186] (HELO mail-iw0-f186.google.com) (209.85.223.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:47:35 +0000 Received: by iwn16 with SMTP id 16so1721032iwn.29 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ax9farP83kYpsI3aL9tUPN6pd/SnlOU6FsWq9D0dXzk=; b=rbODPgbje0tbRPRgx18jBdoN0HSH7m6TNkl6jMcnwvVUpRH64d9wc4sev0L3HOtz4i F5wnfrFQnB2fdw6JosOdj9I3x6o4ugfFRIkD111tB52IS2y5Fu4lFgBintExmUP7z7UT REGBx5hxMHFm3jrBY3il/hsscaBUhNbWyAr5o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KD4M0AR2IhNXchUVkgImWu8wkMu5kjhwJh+DTLVuPI1c3HwnCKvncOLWWZPWRFMEp0 iExDn1CeiPexHnOvqqBNmQtK7KA6ZTI18JIDf745tZw1J63J5GnEFAXvQks21nZa7iyb Yhc9OSSxN5z5BgNc1PVhVzMUybcnlIxVbsmEI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.9.33 with SMTP id j33mr7449380ibj.37.1254188834520; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2c138bed0909260643g47550d6aieee80282b84e061b@mail.gmail.com> <93D2E28A-B3E5-4CA9-8137-BC2F7B38B367@apache.org> <176776ee0909281627y232f4f0ete29c59c3468dbc1e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:47:14 -0400 Message-ID: <176776ee0909281847j2dacb3b0t33a782a0b46ef809@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4 From: Ryan McKinley To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org can we leave it in svn, but drop it from the release? logistically, what is the best way to do this? Make a branch now, remove it from /trunk, after release copy it from the branch back into /trunk? That seems like the best way to kick the can down the road. I agree an off-the-shelf apache license jquery client is great. ryan On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrot= e: > Moving to GPL doesn't seem like a good solution to me, but I don't know w= hat > else to propose. =A0Why don't we just hold it from this release, but keep= it > in trunk and encourage the Drupal guys and others to submit their changes= ? > =A0Perhaps by then Matthias or you or someone else will have stepped up. > > On Sep 28, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > >> I just discussed this off-line with Matthias. =A0It does not look like >> he has the time to give this much attention now. =A0(nor do I) >> >> We agreed that the best steps forward are to: >> 1. Support the Drupal guys GPL port >> 2. Archive the solrjs code to solrstuff.org >> 3. Yank solrjs from apache svn (and 1.4 release) >> 4. Add links to the drupal code (GPL) and the solrjs archive (Apache) >> >> Does this sound reasonable to everybody? >> >> ryan >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll >> wrote: >>> >>> Forwarded with permission from Peter Wolanin on a private thread. >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Peter Wolanin >>>> Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT >>>> To: Grant Ingersoll >>>> >>>> Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4 >>>> >>>> I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for Drupal at Drupalcon >>>> - they are also having to fork potentially around license as much as >>>> anything else, since they'd like to distribute via drupal.org, which >>>> means they were hoping to get the original author to re-license the >>>> code to them as GPL. >>>> >>>> -Peter >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Argh, this was meant for solr-dev. >>>>> >>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>> >>>>>> From: Grant Ingersoll >>>>>> Date: September 25, 2009 1:34:32 PM EDT >>>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: 8 for 1.4 >>>>>> Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> Y'all, >>>>>> >>>>>> We're down to 8 open issues: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseVersion.jspa?id=3D123= 10230&versionId=3D12313351&showOpenIssuesOnly=3Dtrue >>>>>> >>>>>> 2 are packaging related, one is dependent on the official 2.9 releas= e >>>>>> (so >>>>>> should be taken care of today or tomorrow I suspect) and then we hav= e >>>>>> a >>>>>> few >>>>>> others. >>>>>> >>>>>> The only two somewhat major ones are S-1458, S-1294 (more on this in= a >>>>>> mo') and S-1449. >>>>>> >>>>>> On S-1294, the SolrJS patch, I yet again have concerns about even >>>>>> including this, given the lack of activity (from Matthias, the >>>>>> original >>>>>> author and others) and the fact that some in the Drupal community ha= ve >>>>>> already forked this to fix the various bugs in it instead of just >>>>>> submitting >>>>>> patches. =A0While I really like the idea of this library (jQuery is >>>>>> awesome), >>>>>> I have yet to see interest in the community to maintain it (unless y= ou >>>>>> count >>>>>> someone forking it and fixing the bugs in the fork as maintenance) a= nd >>>>>> I'll >>>>>> be upfront in admitting I have neither the time nor the patience to >>>>>> debug >>>>>> Javascript across the gazillions of browsers out there (I don't even >>>>>> have IE >>>>>> on my machine unless you count firing up a VM w/ XP on it) in the >>>>>> wild. >>>>>> =A0Given what I know of most of the other committers here, I suspect >>>>>> that >>>>>> is >>>>>> true for others too. =A0At a minimum, I think S-1294 should be pushe= d to >>>>>> 1.5. >>>>>> =A0Next up, I think we consider pulling SolrJS from the release, but >>>>>> keeping >>>>>> it in trunk and officially releasing it with either 1.5 or 1.4.1, >>>>>> assuming >>>>>> its gotten some love in the meantime. =A0If by then it has no love, = I >>>>>> vote >>>>>> we >>>>>> remove it and let the fork maintain it and point people there. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Grant >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Peter M. Wolanin, Ph.D. >>>> Momentum Specialist, =A0Acquia. Inc. >>>> peter.wolanin@acquia.com >>> >>> -------------------------- >>> Grant Ingersoll >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/ >>> >>> Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids) usin= g >>> Solr/Lucene: >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search >>> >>> > > -------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com/ > > Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids) using > Solr/Lucene: > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search > >