lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Au <bill.w...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 8 for 1.4
Date Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:09:14 GMT
Dropping it completely from 1.4 seems a little too drastic to me, since the
problem is with IE8 only.
Bill

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com> wrote:

> can we leave it in svn, but drop it from the release?  logistically,
> what is the best way to do this?  Make a branch now, remove it from
> /trunk, after release copy it from the branch back into /trunk?
>
> That seems like the best way to kick the can down the road.  I agree
> an off-the-shelf apache license jquery client is great.
>
> ryan
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Moving to GPL doesn't seem like a good solution to me, but I don't know
> what
> > else to propose.  Why don't we just hold it from this release, but keep
> it
> > in trunk and encourage the Drupal guys and others to submit their
> changes?
> >  Perhaps by then Matthias or you or someone else will have stepped up.
> >
> > On Sep 28, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> >
> >> I just discussed this off-line with Matthias.  It does not look like
> >> he has the time to give this much attention now.  (nor do I)
> >>
> >> We agreed that the best steps forward are to:
> >> 1. Support the Drupal guys GPL port
> >> 2. Archive the solrjs code to solrstuff.org
> >> 3. Yank solrjs from apache svn (and 1.4 release)
> >> 4. Add links to the drupal code (GPL) and the solrjs archive (Apache)
> >>
> >> Does this sound reasonable to everybody?
> >>
> >> ryan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Forwarded with permission from Peter Wolanin on a private thread.
> >>>
> >>> Begin forwarded message:
> >>>
> >>>> From: Peter Wolanin <peter.wolanin@acquia.com>
> >>>> Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT
> >>>> To: Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4
> >>>>
> >>>> I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for Drupal at Drupalcon
> >>>> - they are also having to fork potentially around license as much as
> >>>> anything else, since they'd like to distribute via drupal.org, which
> >>>> means they were hoping to get the original author to re-license the
> >>>> code to them as GPL.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Peter
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Argh, this was meant for solr-dev.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Begin forwarded message:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> >>>>>> Date: September 25, 2009 1:34:32 PM EDT
> >>>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>> Subject: 8 for 1.4
> >>>>>> Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Y'all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We're down to 8 open issues:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseVersion.jspa?id=12310230&versionId=12313351&showOpenIssuesOnly=true
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2 are packaging related, one is dependent on the official 2.9
> release
> >>>>>> (so
> >>>>>> should be taken care of today or tomorrow I suspect) and then
we
> have
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>> few
> >>>>>> others.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The only two somewhat major ones are S-1458, S-1294 (more on
this in
> a
> >>>>>> mo') and S-1449.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On S-1294, the SolrJS patch, I yet again have concerns about
even
> >>>>>> including this, given the lack of activity (from Matthias, the
> >>>>>> original
> >>>>>> author and others) and the fact that some in the Drupal community
> have
> >>>>>> already forked this to fix the various bugs in it instead of
just
> >>>>>> submitting
> >>>>>> patches.  While I really like the idea of this library (jQuery
is
> >>>>>> awesome),
> >>>>>> I have yet to see interest in the community to maintain it (unless
> you
> >>>>>> count
> >>>>>> someone forking it and fixing the bugs in the fork as maintenance)
> and
> >>>>>> I'll
> >>>>>> be upfront in admitting I have neither the time nor the patience
to
> >>>>>> debug
> >>>>>> Javascript across the gazillions of browsers out there (I don't
even
> >>>>>> have IE
> >>>>>> on my machine unless you count firing up a VM w/ XP on it) in
the
> >>>>>> wild.
> >>>>>>  Given what I know of most of the other committers here, I suspect
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>> true for others too.  At a minimum, I think S-1294 should be
pushed
> to
> >>>>>> 1.5.
> >>>>>>  Next up, I think we consider pulling SolrJS from the release,
but
> >>>>>> keeping
> >>>>>> it in trunk and officially releasing it with either 1.5 or 1.4.1,
> >>>>>> assuming
> >>>>>> its gotten some love in the meantime.  If by then it has no
love, I
> >>>>>> vote
> >>>>>> we
> >>>>>> remove it and let the fork maintain it and point people there.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Grant
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Peter M. Wolanin, Ph.D.
> >>>> Momentum Specialist,  Acquia. Inc.
> >>>> peter.wolanin@acquia.com
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> Grant Ingersoll
> >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
> >>>
> >>> Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
> using
> >>> Solr/Lucene:
> >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Grant Ingersoll
> > http://www.lucidimagination.com/
> >
> > Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids) using
> > Solr/Lucene:
> > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message