Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48542 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2009 03:14:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2009 03:14:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 37662 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 03:14:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 37610 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 03:14:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 37600 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2009 03:14:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:14:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.226] (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:14:47 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so3754646ewy.5 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:14:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c3cqmH1MwCAh0KN2LOcJNKT6XxVbF6qCXi5EMdWM66g=; b=SwovqKl46X3Tvso7vCRg2wS8HiDI3mX0u3ANsrRfldQXbjeHf2s3JkPJoxKw+M5Ryh Qa+6EK9Znvo0gEWtlbyU8I30u/QDGLqr4cG7N2RmnLeLzkoT93Txi0OcuFlajy3veUE7 z3zFS2aq1XtLZ5vMBOa/eAxsZUe1TgpWh45JA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Q605oJZxBATgZR3+y7vMm9WW5LFVJ2tvRTUySulFylGhrlQuUBM2DLYhDMJzTIup0J fmr6gD0TscHOuSJYzi8FlqJlDdnbYeOy1BhVNLVTd7EzoWTG5ixJ6NYakN0Xhr9VA8TQ VzfFEOVXCy5CCeEvW6DPnowEsE202PGlDH7rQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.91.21 with SMTP id g21mr1070100wef.99.1249269265686; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:14:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <412580.54099.qm@web50305.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <412580.54099.qm@web50305.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:14:25 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d715048a3be9a137 Message-ID: Subject: Re: trie fields default in example schema From: Yonik Seeley To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Would it make sense to instead add new tint(eger) type instead of renaming integer to pinteger? (thinking about people upgrading to Solr 1.4). People upgrading can always use their existing schemas - remember that the naming is local to the schema... the class always defines the real behavior and the java class names won't be changing. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com