Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18383 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2009 19:02:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2009 19:02:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 96120 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2009 19:02:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 96043 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2009 19:02:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 96033 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2009 19:02:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:02:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryantxu@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.192] (HELO mail-qy0-f192.google.com) (209.85.221.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:02:40 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1403973qyk.5 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:02:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=wOXUY8cFPNbhjWOZHA7Mt1gr+7tJGG6sXJeoVVEq1o0=; b=C3CuzwD565e4m7gleda0bD6Nv0uZqiQP56udYi+S5LO+IY1Ld8UvyrAEcnVaL7vZ1T idgnk/fT64vlfAG1O0mk/6nvhoXZLnEx5qFvtdeDSRIPqzliBNtR5OmVtawU3QMXM0m0 GuqjyxGmoC6uAzdC9591jkBPEX1v6axCSjIXA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=OhyQej9DyKPguCic02HrTupT6AvzZokk5nEF/AD1I0/Kn6SRoIHo/3HTWGnQLdyzQ0 0URS8Sgb70k+qRI3ia9JJRGG5jnfwhgiPuWhdmNY4RlnoQ4MDfWhWUSkogz5w1jp/KN5 oOIop3OvlOyphgd1SId/FDCVbfMFkF/tjoWwU= Received: by 10.224.123.103 with SMTP id o39mr1471682qar.93.1251486139425; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.7? ([66.92.161.165]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm640825qwh.23.2009.08.28.12.02.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <8A2060A8-B782-481A-8C51-0BF212C0E011@gmail.com> From: Ryan McKinley To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: <0852AB8D-D4CE-4EA3-B0F8-8AB80D5EBF23@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Lucene RC2 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:02:17 -0400 References: <0852AB8D-D4CE-4EA3-B0F8-8AB80D5EBF23@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org have not tried it yet.... but we should certainly upgrade. the more testing the better! On Aug 28, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Anyone tried out the new Lucene RC2 in Solr yet? Should we upgrade > to it?