lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Multiple facet.prefix?
Date Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:18:14 GMT
>
> So if you asked for the top 10, you would be fine with receiving all A* or
> all B* of those happened to be the top?  Or do you really want the top 10 A*
> and the top 10 B*?

For all use cases so far, yes.

No, that's just the thing - multiple prefixes specified this way would be
> the same logical facet.. hence no way to specify different limits, sorts, or
> whatever... those are per facet.
>
Awesome, we are all on the same page then.

So, this is it -
facet.field=myField&f.foo.facet.prefix=foo&f.foo.facet.prefix=bar
Right?

Cheers
Avlesh

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Yonik Seeley
<yonik@lucidimagination.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Avlesh Singh<avlesh@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Different ways to look at it Yonik. For things that I have needed this
> for,
> > so far (field:A* OR field:B*) was just as fine.
>
> So if you asked for the top 10, you would be fine with receiving all
> A* or all B* of those happened to be the top?  Or do you really want
> the top 10 A* and the top 10 B*?
>
> > Anyways, for me to file the ticket, what usage are we looking for? As
> > underneath?
> > facet.field=myField&f.foo.facet.prefix=foo&f.foo.facet.prefix=bar
> >
> > How would sort, limit and other parameters be passed? As underneath?
> > f.foo.facet.prefix.foo.sort=false&f.foo.facet.prefix.foo.limit=100
>
> No, that's just the thing - multiple prefixes specified this way would
> be the same logical facet.. hence no way to specify different limits,
> sorts, or whatever... those are per facet.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message