Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73130 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 18:37:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 18:37:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 57182 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 18:38:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 57097 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 18:38:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 57086 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 18:38:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:38:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.245 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.245] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:38:13 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so887997ana.5 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:37:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=s7nvg5PdfIEbI12TsrJHn04+ld28PON4Se3IZirWX3A=; b=m1GlYISHQ66bp1wF1oJJoovjvfGOf2OGbah3a1WOM5jHkmF84PIcl6jS+aZNdPZxbK r6lU8GAOHwY7ASObwlniJVe/tB5OxYyqw7ESaTLmBiBA9dL9MPkifKjdd9XFQD8mOoCc lgWARfAz7WM6m26iSMT+fKhswwdP2cDHy5Om4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qnMvo9kEa6X+BOGEXvEN1tZEjfUDW84L++VniPIU6EI0/poROR9/kblhHptyWeqj9/ e8/wvQv7lDOBSGLTFe+ZXx+W4ZeGItkk1thjBQ/Aj8RdsxjbfSF/hkmfRaRyf0JiAgnS picNkVD6r9DnsfBsPsFZqtHTwlCGrH06j6dhk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.46.10 with SMTP id t10mr4891308ant.116.1248460672588; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:37:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:37:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solr BufferedTokenStream and new Lucene 2.9 TokenStream API From: Mark Miller To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f945a6e7da60046f77e6fb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f945a6e7da60046f77e6fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Never a need to wait on opening an issue - the work might wait, but an issue keeps it in the collective memory as a todo. On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote: > Hello all, > > Would it be appropriate to open a JIRA issue to get converting the Solr > BufferedTokenStream class to use the new Lucene 2.9 token API on the todo > list ? Alternatively is there a more general issue already open regarding > Solr filters and the new API? (I couldn't find one) Or is it better to > wait until the Lucene 2.9 API becomes final ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693) before opening a JIRA > issue? > > Tom Burton-West > > -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --001485f945a6e7da60046f77e6fb--