Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32835 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 10:16:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 10:16:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 57723 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 57650 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 57640 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:16:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of noble.paul@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.234 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.234] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.234) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:16:07 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so1568683rvb.5 for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:15:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1WRR7FOjNRGBpP5rdVhJlT8l7/+eY2GUqDom2Y/D/W0=; b=Woy+8yzlk0jPasNgCwWqpJtu0//Z5PRIVgRD0Sz+t0U9ZKfvGycTb1Jl8QwXQv6yEf 62MsG6zCKiWmqbOlWn47ff2psqZpKXCW/tTh88H4A4iVjo4CY1KPa6gXNl01wCKYgzmh XcCa8gCtdInz5zKf3CE2nCqNQ47aiiSsSE6RY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:from:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UYXwZxNgT2WCUbUyAtEUiug5zjmyHR9ndFcPcdt6YrH5GYBQ1pzBSXiDNj+JsZrH8S bQs/9luBHFB5kArSaJKKERcBlX1kJXMOJtQRdUB7/xPAM6O41skrjZl3r8pJ2vGTHgco fZdofnhqy5EmwcD6Dd0h/Hj0f1/pKT05nb8bs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: noble.paul@gmail.com Reply-To: noble.paul@gmail.com Received: by 10.141.48.10 with SMTP id a10mr5953377rvk.250.1244542547182; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:15:47 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?B?Tm9ibGUgUGF1bCDgtKjgtYvgtKzgtL/gtLPgtY3igI0gIOCkqOCli+CkrOCljeCks+CljQ==?= Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:45:27 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 081be71ef050d586 Message-ID: <5e76b0ad0906090315q61e100ebl3179df6cdfc815e7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Why is it not possible to write a SolrCoreAware HighLighter? To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org There is a restriction on what all classes can be SolrCoreAware/ResourceLoaderAware. What is the basis on which it is decided? -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com