lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: aaah, using trunk is fun! -- Illegal sort type: 2
Date Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:01:46 GMT
Oh, okay. Thats a deprecated constructor that will set the type to 
auto:2. Should have occurred to me that Solr doesn't use auto anyway :) 
Hard to switch my mind between these two projects.

I can't remember the discussion around this and back compat :)  I'll 
have to dig back.

You need to resolve that Sort field since the new sort collector won't 
do it for you anymore. So either grab the field type from Solr and set 
it rather than using AUTO, or resolve it with:
sortField = new SortField(field, SortField.detectFieldType(reader,field));

- Mark

Ryan McKinley wrote:
> Digging in a little more...  this is triggered by a custom search
> component that takes some parameters and adds a custom filter to the
> mix.
>
> In the component prepare() function, it checks if the there is a sort
> defined, if not it defaults to something:
>
>         SortSpec sortSpec = builder.getSortSpec();
>         if( sortSpec.getSort() == null ) {
>           sortSpec.setSort( new Sort( new SortField[] {
>               new SortField( "afield", true )
>           }));
>         }
>
> If I comment this out, I do not get the error (not surprising)
>
> However, if I add the sort field to the original query it works without problem.
>
> Perhaps there has been some changen that now requires me to do something else?
>
> Any ideas?
>
> thanks
> ryan
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Mark Miller<markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Type 2 is auto and its been deprecated in Lucene.
>>
>> Not sure why you are seeing this issue though. Could be the recent changes
>> to Solr for LUCENE-1483 - auto now has to be resolved before using the
>> collector, ie using int autotype = SortField.detectFieldType(reader,
>> fieldname);
>>
>> I remember this changing but not the exact details.
>>
>> Probably Solr is not doing this though.
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> Ryan McKinley wrote:
>>     
>>> Just started getting this error with a recent update:
>>>
>>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Illegal sort type: 2
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.lucene.search.SortField.getComparator(SortField.java:492)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.lucene.search.FieldValueHitQueue$OneComparatorFieldValueHitQueue.<init>(FieldValueHitQueue.java:80)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.lucene.search.FieldValueHitQueue.create(FieldValueHitQueue.java:190)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.lucene.search.TopFieldCollector.create(TopFieldCollector.java:851)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListAndSetNC(SolrIndexSearcher.java:1082)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListC(SolrIndexSearcher.java:880)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.search(SolrIndexSearcher.java:341)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.process(QueryComponent.java:176)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:195)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:131)
>>>        at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1290)
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.EmbeddedSolrServer.request(EmbeddedSolrServer.java:139)
>>>
>>>
>>> This only happens when I combine a custom filter with a text search
>>> (same custom filter as the last time).
>>>
>>> Before digging deeply into what solr/lucene rev changed the behavior,
>>> I just want to check if this rings a bell with anyone....
>>>
>>> thanks!
>>> ryan
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> - Mark
>>
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




Mime
View raw message