Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56176 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 17:32:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 17:32:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 98451 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 17:32:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98392 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 17:32:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98374 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 17:32:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:32:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jacobsingh@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.230] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:32:34 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so849320rvb.5 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 10:32:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qwC0EetTnVB4XytKtQMmpj3yhoVGrSMkMjsFGflHos4=; b=bLTqX/RETTiYW7h9saSqPrENEm0Dsj3K402qcbUh5iRF+Ndd1sCyIgMN0Mm7i/SAsY hdCjpEz/4f4vutEjweUZmcYDOg99/yLWGtXwxERDMt+2D6nguyDgOsyXwu6QJn6u8+kt 3ndO3etPbKg2X9bIS3eNyVeXVTV+YehRxEahA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=w7/hG9iftHRuv0nrF2G3Qc3uXtwAUeeuJiUfa87hSYCZqiLi3gX2L6OZEpPJttfgxS ACTmdqD+hE9/SLfJQ+9xUIa80IvXms8R9DwS14bhM9si8JRpSWxq2LSfdCXaLJjrP6hh 3Map1nc4pWEpxKqNYatI0v6Jl/wIT92ZCJmDo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.162.1 with SMTP id p1mr835502rvo.259.1242322332904; Thu, 14 May 2009 10:32:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1B66918A-0ACD-44E5-A5E3-9F27EFE61A9C@apache.org> References: <3C1C3934-0561-4617-A30D-BC107DF8385E@apache.org> <1CFD7891521AAB4E8201FB7A78C9D36FCE31E6@mail-001.corp.automotive.com> <1B66918A-0ACD-44E5-A5E3-9F27EFE61A9C@apache.org> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:02:12 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solr 1.4 From: Jacob Singh To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > It's not like anything all that magical necessarily happens with a releas= e. > =A0Sure, we package up the bits and there is some legal ramifications, I > suppose, but the software is more or less the same. =A0In other words, mo= st > people should be fine with trunk, or some recent revision. In fact if mor= e > people tried out trunk, it would be faster to release b/c we would have m= ore > vetting done. > We (Acquia) have been using a 1.4 nightlies (updating every month or so) since January 15th in production. We haven't had any problems with builds that pass tests at all. Granted, we're not doing sharding, field collapsing or some other features which may be "advanced", but we are using java replication in multicore heavily and have played around a bit with the Tika extension without issues. Best, Jacob --=20 +1 510 277-0891 (o) +91 9999 33 7458 (m) web: http://pajamadesign.com Skype: pajamadesign Yahoo: jacobsingh AIM: jacobsingh gTalk: jacobsingh@gmail.com