Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97505 invoked from network); 13 May 2009 20:03:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2009 20:03:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 31851 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2009 20:03:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 31794 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2009 20:03:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 31783 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2009 20:03:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 20:03:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.119] (HELO spunkymail-a7.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.119) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 20:02:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.102] (adsl-074-229-189-244.sip.rmo.bellsouth.net [74.229.189.244]) by spunkymail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553515B62A for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 13:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3C1C3934-0561-4617-A30D-BC107DF8385E@apache.org> From: Grant Ingersoll To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Solr 1.4 Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:02:27 -0400 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 13, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll > wrote: >> Seems like we're reaching critical mass again, but there is a lot >> of issues >> that are open, or not even marked. >> >> Do people think we can shoot for 1.4 in the coming month (say mid- >> June)? > > +1 > > I was sort of shooting for the end of May, but schedules do tend to I know time-wise, I won't have the bandwidth before then, but if someone else wants to be the RM, be my guest. I figured it would give us the time to get the 1.4 issues resolved. -Grant