lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eger, Patrick" <pe...@automotive.com>
Subject RE: Solr 1.4
Date Thu, 14 May 2009 16:35:08 GMT
Yeah, at least for us, the corporate overlords (and our operations team) would be *extremely*
hesitant to go to production with any kind of snapshot release. If there was a "weekly stable"
or similar that might be slightly better, but definitely not a CI/nightly.


Best Regards, 

Patrick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: noble.paul@gmail.com [mailto:noble.paul@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Noble Paul ??????? ??????
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 5:55 AM
> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr 1.4
> 
> The advantage is that there is strength in numbers. There will be a
> lot of users using the release build and if there is an issue the user
> can rest assured that there will others who need the same fix on the
> same revision. (so a better chance of a resolution)
> 
> moreover there won't be any half baked fixes in a release
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On May 13, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Eger, Patrick wrote:
> >
> >> +2
> >>
> >> This would be very much appreciated by your users, I at least was
> >> expecting March :-) We were hoping to release with 1.4 (specifically
> for
> >> java replication and field collapsing) but had to redo some plans since
> >> it seemed to keep slipping.
> >
> > It's not like anything all that magical necessarily happens with a
> release.
> >  Sure, we package up the bits and there is some legal ramifications, I
> > suppose, but the software is more or less the same.  In other words,
> most
> > people should be fine with trunk, or some recent revision. In fact if
> more
> > people tried out trunk, it would be faster to release b/c we would have
> more
> > vetting done.
> >
> >> Not complaining, just FYI on our experiences
> >> (it's a free product after all). A 4-6 month release schedule would be
> >> ideal for us, whereas it looks like it'll be ~9-10 months currently?
> >> Again, not complaining, just trying to get SOLR into production!
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute ;-)
> >
> > -Grant
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com

Mime
View raw message