lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Amit Nithian (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1137) Improve package naming for DIH
Date Fri, 01 May 2009 07:19:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704910#action_12704910
] 

Amit Nithian commented on SOLR-1137:
------------------------------------

I thought one of the bugs/features was to make DIH more API friendly so I figured this would
be a good way to do so. Also, many of the comments indicate that the API is subject to change
so I didn't think much of backwards compatibility due to this statement.

regarding the user seeing the benefit, the common end-user won't but from a developer's perspective,
it just keeps the code more organized and cleaner.

> Improve package naming for DIH
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1137
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Amit Nithian
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently all classes in the DIH are lumped into one package. I would like to propose
a better package naming convention for the DIH:
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport => for those that don't fit into any of the other
three but don't warrant their own package yet.
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.datasource
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.transformer
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.processor
> Create a test folder and mirror the package names for test classes so that test classes
are not lumped into src 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message