Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <1911016052.1240859070538.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-773) Incorporate Local Lucene/Solr
In-Reply-To: <1089092633.1221505424636.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12703299#action_12703299 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-773:
-----------------------------------

bq. I am not familiar with the function query internal - would it get called for things that do not match the filter? Distance calculations are typically the most expensive part of the query.

Right... function query currently *does* get called before filters are checked - but that's because current function queries are part of the main relevancy query.  A function query that was only used to sort would only be called for docs that match the main relevancy query and all filters though.

The performance issue would be the "boost" scenario - when the distance calculation is part of the main query.  That's another generic Solr issue we should tackle at some point... filter efficiency.  Related to LUCENE-1536 I think (but we could already do this relatively easily for BitDocSet... just not HashDocSet).

> Incorporate Local Lucene/Solr
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-773
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: lucene.tar.gz, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773.patch, SOLR-773.patch, spatial-solr.tar.gz
>
>
> Local Lucene has been donated to the Lucene project.  It has some Solr components, but we should evaluate how best to incorporate it into Solr.
> See http://lucene.markmail.org/message/orzro22sqdj3wows?q=LocalLucene

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.