Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <36267334.1230076964378.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:02:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-936) Facet Results - REST vs SolrJ
In-Reply-To: <1154828144.1230014024137.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12659001#action_12659001 ] 

Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-936:
------------------------------------

You may also want to check out SOLR-911 or SOLR-792 -- solrj does not deal with this functionality yet.  Contributions are welcome!

> Facet Results - REST vs SolrJ
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-936
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-936
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: clients - java, search
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Andrew Nagy
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> There is a difference in the way Facet results are reported in SolrJ from the REST interface.  In REST, if you apply a facet via the fq param, no matter what the count it is always reported back in the list of facets in the responses.  However, with SolrJ - it only reports back facets that don't match the total number of documents.  This is quite frustrating to deal with.  
> The difference can be seen when ORing or ANDing in the fq param.  When I or to facet values together, they come back in SolrJ since their counts don't match the total docs.  But if I AND them together, they don't appear in the list.  So then I need to munge in the applied fq values.
> Why the difference in behavior between REST and SolrJ?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.