lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 1.4 Planning
Date Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:29:57 GMT
Hey Todd,

Yeah, I hear you on the Lucene thing, but am not quite sure how to  
handle it.  As Hoss' has said, by us voting to release Solr, we are  
also voting to release that particular version of Lucene.  It means we  
have confidence that it will do the job for Solr.   If it's just a  
source issue, we can package up the sources into the Maven repo.  I'm  
hesitant to suggest that we package the Lucene source into the main  
distribution.  Maybe we just point people to the repo?  Can you open a  
JIRA issue against 1.4 to track this so that we don't forget to do it?

Thanks,
Grant

On Dec 10, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Feak, Todd wrote:

> One of the things about the 1.3 release that I didn't care for, was  
> the
> inclusion of a non-release version of Lucene. It was very difficult to
> track down the source code for the "dev" version that was used. Once
> Lucene had release its official version, I upgraded to that (which  
> went
> well) so that I had access to Lucene source.
>
> If Lucene is going to release relatively soon, a release after that
> might be nice.
>
> For what it's worth, I understand the difficulty of having 2 projects
> running in parallel with the dependency between them. While trying to
> improve both at the same time. I'm not trying to throw stones, just
> sharing an opinion.
>
> -Todd Feak
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryantxu@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 1:20 PM
> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 1.4 Planning
>
> sounds good.
>
> is lucene planning a release anytime soon?  If so, is it worth
> *trying* to coordinate?
>
>
>
> On Dec 10, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> I'd like to suggest we start thinking about 1.4 being released in
>> early January.  Here's my reasoning:
>>
>> 1. I think we all agree that 1.2 -> 1.3 was way too long
>> 2. Quarterly releases seem to be a pretty nice timeframe for people
>> such that you aren't constantly upgrading, yet you don't have to
>> wait for eternity for new features
>> 3. And here's where the rubber meets the road:  We've actually put
>> in some significant features and bug fixes, namely Java-based
>> Replication, Tika Integration, new more scalable faceting
>> implementation and on and on, not to mention Lucene improvements and
>> other bug fixes.  Read about it at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt
>>
>> Here's what's currently targeted to 1.4:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mod
> e=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/ 
> field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=1231023
> 0&fixfor=12313351
>>
>> Since I so enjoyed doing the release last time, I volunteer to do it
>> again this time.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -Grant
>
>

--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll

Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ











Mime
View raw message