lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-936) Facet Results - REST vs SolrJ
Date Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:47:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658884#action_12658884
] 

Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-936:
------------------------------------

actually, perhaps you are using:

QueryResponse#getFacetFields()
   vs
QueryResponse#getLimitingFacets();

The first returns all results directly from solr, the second returns facets that will reduce
the number of documents returned.

> Facet Results - REST vs SolrJ
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-936
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-936
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: clients - java, search
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Andrew Nagy
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> There is a difference in the way Facet results are reported in SolrJ from the REST interface.
 In REST, if you apply a facet via the fq param, no matter what the count it is always reported
back in the list of facets in the responses.  However, with SolrJ - it only reports back facets
that don't match the total number of documents.  This is quite frustrating to deal with. 

> The difference can be seen when ORing or ANDing in the fq param.  When I or to facet
values together, they come back in SolrJ since their counts don't match the total docs.  But
if I AND them together, they don't appear in the list.  So then I need to munge in the applied
fq values.
> Why the difference in behavior between REST and SolrJ?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message