Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 16391 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2008 13:37:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2008 13:37:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 85667 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 13:37:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85647 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 13:37:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85636 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2008 13:37:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:37:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.162.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.162.178] (HELO el-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.162.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:36:34 +0000 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m34so91717ele.14 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:36:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=lpZTcb4y5oNuspUiKxBr0qBvcgXUOxrQfQnBzap2F0A=; b=Cb7MZAX1VkOXJV9yO8IRubCltVANecFrBNOyV9PFsZvA7+tVc9bTW61BGPfM+tN5pU LbvlQkOTf9JQWPIOrIOOU3Rs/ISiKMczvZ5RihNI6+f3bgtN+qnEHu4ocjn2qOOzgJ1a 0jnOvL5D7ZuHlaJWWUHhqvpjfWbZrcV5D1E4U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=K0at4eNxToQYMqw6f7+D3yQwMSKB1WmQgRFFTZBlxqf2h8PfFFZEpPnigBb9rHw5PD MHl92eGstIubbDsuF4PwDBlLaG2/NimRBU7kCTtqVmtu2mFo7FiuVqjVtZXDfCyYtNtx lRyfuz0jdaOw7n8W+spjQBuWPr/sob1Bj5/Ro= Received: by 10.150.95.15 with SMTP id s15mr336787ybb.210.1215092215276; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.227.18 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 06:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:36:55 -0400 From: "Yonik Seeley" Sender: yseeley@gmail.com To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: lesser noise in solrconfig.xml In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5e76b0ad0807030014v7661d288m7400d644ef86357f@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cc9b638ada6003ea X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > I agree and your proposal is reasonable, but I hate to think of us inventing > yet another way to write configuration files and do initialization stuff. I > think we really need to consider Solr 2.0 running on Spring. +1 -Yonik