lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Solr 1.3 release date
Date Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:49:35 GMT
I have been using 6.1.11 also.
I think it should be safe to upgrade before 1.3


On Jul 12, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> I'm pro 6.1.11.  I've used it on several occasions now and haven't  
> seen any problems with it.
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net>
>> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 6:40:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: Solr 1.3 release date
>>
>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:25:32 -0400
>> "Yonik Seeley" wrote:
>>
>>> 1) The current version has been tested for a year with this specific
>>> application (Solr) and thus it's less risky sticking with it, esp
>>> since we haven't seen any problems.
>>
>> agreed.
>>
>>> 2) Many bugs have been fixed in the latest patch release of Jetty...
>>> and just because we don't think we've encountered bugs in the old
>>> version doesn't mean that others won't.
>>
>> indeed, and these could affect newcomers to SOLR that use the  
>> sample setup as a
>> comparison point... as I understand it, there have been some  
>> performance
>> improvements in Jetty, at least on/from 6.1.5, but I don't know  
>> enough about it
>> to say whether they would affect a SOLR installation.
>>
>>> IMO, If we don't upgrade now, it makes sense to upgrade immediately
>>> after a 1.3 release.
>>
>> np - let me know how/when and I'll be happy to chip in.
>> B
>> _________________________
>> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
>>
>> My wish is that your day will be a good one.
>> If not.......
>> May the fleas of one thousand camels infest the crotch of the  
>> person who screws
>> up your day and may their arms be too short to scratch.
>>
>> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery  
>> when wet.
>> Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You  
>> have been
>> Warned.
>


Mime
View raw message