Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 56491 invoked from network); 7 May 2008 16:05:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 May 2008 16:05:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 36892 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2008 16:06:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 36861 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2008 16:06:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 36850 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2008 16:06:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 May 2008 09:06:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.5] (HELO spunkymail-a4.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 May 2008 16:05:04 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-074-229-189-244.sip.rmo.bellsouth.net [74.229.189.244]) by spunkymail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD223BA07 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 09:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Grant Ingersoll To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: <130051317.1210087975866.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-560) Convert JDK logging to SLF4J Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 12:05:22 -0400 References: <130051317.1210087975866.JavaMail.jira@brutus> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FYI, I will take a look at this next week (just in case you are wondering why I haven't since I was the one making the noise). On May 6, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Sean Timm (JIRA) wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12594603 > #action_12594603 ] > > Sean Timm commented on SOLR-560: > -------------------------------- > > Thanks for taking a look at SOLR-554, Patrick. > > I did test the log level selector with this SLF4J patch and it works > fine as is. It might be desirable to change the log level names in > the log level selector to match the names in SLF4J however. > > From the SLF4J FAQ: > "SLF4J is only a facade, meaning that it does not provide a complete > logging solution. Operations such as [...] setting logging levels > cannot be performed with SLF4J." > >> Convert JDK logging to SLF4J >> ---------------------------- >> >> Key: SOLR-560 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-560 >> Project: Solr >> Issue Type: Wish >> Reporter: Ryan McKinley >> Fix For: 1.3 >> >> Attachments: slf4j-api-1.5.0.jar, slf4j-jdk14-1.5.0.jar, >> SOLR-560-slf4j.patch, SOLR-560-slf4j.patch >> >> >> After lots of discussion, we should consider using SLF4j to enable >> more flexibility in logging configuration. >> See: >> http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Logging-td16836646.html >> http://www.nabble.com/logging-through-log4j-td13747253.html > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >