lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-342) Add support for Lucene's new Indexing and merge features (excluding Document/Field/Token reuse)
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:03:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567221#action_12567221
] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-342:
--------------------------------------

Direct core meaning embedded, right?  It's interesting, b/c I have done a fair amount of Lucene
2.3 testing w/ Wikipedia (nothing like a free, fairly large dataset)

Can you reproduce the problem using Lucene directly? (have a look at contrib/benchmark for
a way to get Lucene/Wikipedia up and running quickly)

Also, are there any associated exceptions anywhere in the chain?  Or is it just that your
index is bad?  Are you starting from a clean index or updating an existing one?

> Add support for Lucene's new Indexing and merge features (excluding Document/Field/Token
reuse)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-342
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-342
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: update
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: copyLucene.sh, SOLR-342.patch, SOLR-342.patch, SOLR-342.patch, SOLR-342.tar.gz
>
>
> LUCENE-843 adds support for new indexing capabilities using the setRAMBufferSizeMB()
method that should significantly speed up indexing for many applications.  To fix this, we
will need trunk version of Lucene (or wait for the next official release of Lucene)
> Side effect of this is that Lucene's new, faster StandardTokenizer will also be incorporated.
 
> Also need to think about how we want to incorporate the new merge scheduling functionality
(new default in Lucene is to do merges in a background thread)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message