Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 39148 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2007 00:02:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2007 00:02:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 76400 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2007 00:02:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76379 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2007 00:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76370 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2007 00:02:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:02:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mike.klaas@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.181] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:02:17 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so908874wah for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:02:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=tqWeKAbUZVdpIs3hr4x5Vg6xTmNk0rWughy/wdca/io=; b=WWOqKTkSh9SiiIsCllKfbV+JE/a6u7LS1ejBEEzrvGEyeumuqz6XhX6wYrxLbQbsIph4EGvtPaNtCwmeG8dDTwonEn5j1czMgbY3U/M48pUmeNYYgFYZkaNJVBgzRqS1QJRdjTIU6ORio6ZIPayttg1rkv+OMavH3OsSH1QzAUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=WquuWWHEKg8J8KqcTnGCn4s2jzs4L96dXoWrT1U/5zMumAfDfX3AD8QP5eXLeaHR8QtlzL4rOjtbV6Y0H++SViDMigtwoe9OAhRwNKiBatqapPggItJvAzTjVWFqwYbGr428SReQ5D9qMIVgsmtzhqR8uIQA341sjTsKmXUV7bU= Received: by 10.114.199.1 with SMTP id w1mr1350851waf.1195171330770; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:02:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.108? ( [24.82.155.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l22sm614271waf.2007.11.15.16.02.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:02:08 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <200711140900.00296.paul.elschot@xs4all.nl> References: <8D089A39-7231-441C-88C4-8EE51B4F9E45@gmail.com> <200711140900.00296.paul.elschot@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mike Klaas Subject: Re: Intuition check Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:01:57 -0800 To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 14-Nov-07, at 12:00 AM, Paul Elschot wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 06:42:56 Mike Klaas wrote: > ... >> ... I was >> imagining that it was necessary to embed the filter clauses in the >> "core" to produce an effective implementation. By the time I >> finished my response, I had read enough of the relevant Lucene scorer >> code (in particular, ReqOptScorer) to realize that the benefits would >> be had using an outer-layer ConjunctionQuery as well. > > I have a extension of Lucene's ConjunctionSumScorer that allows > filter clauses, but it's waiting for > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584 . LUCENE-584 is the ideal means of implementing this, though it seems that it will be in 2.4 at the earliest. It is cool stuff though--I added a vote. -Mike