lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-135) Restructure / Refactor codebase for shared libraries
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:11:27 GMT


Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-135:

>it would be easy to move this package to live in src/common if people think there is a
need, my main concern is just that we shouldn't have "org.apache.solr.util" living in two
places (src/java and src/common)

yes, I like separate package names better.... but i'm worried about the impact on dependent

The classes needed for SOLR-20 are:

Are you suggesting its ok to move and to o.a.s.common?  That seems
kinda extreme for anyone using the classes...

If it is ok, i'm all for it...  if not, I think we should make the 'common' package and put
anything new in there, adding comments to the classes that should be moved in the future.

> Restructure / Refactor codebase for shared libraries
> ----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-135
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-135-RestructureForCommonJar.patch, SOLR-135-RestructureForCommonJar.patch,
> For SOLR-20 and other java projects, it would be nice to have common code share a codebase
that does not require lucene or junit to compile.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message