lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: stax vs xpp XmlUpdateHandler
Date Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:23:17 GMT
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 6/29/07, Ryan McKinley <ryan@squid-labs.com> wrote:
>> How do you all feel about moving:
>>   XmlUpdateRequestHandler -> XppUpdateRequestHandler
>>   StaxUpdateRequestHandler -> XmlUpdateRequestHandler
>>
>> then deprecating XppUpdateRequestHandler?
> 
> +1
> 
> I think we could remove the XppUpdateRequestHandler relatively quickly
> to get rid of the XPP dependency.  It's more of an implementation
> detail and shouldn't be visible to most users.
> 

I will go ahead and make this change.  The XppUpdateRequestHandler will 
still be there if something is amiss.  We should remove it (and the 
dependencies) before 1.3

ryan


Mime
View raw message