[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-272:
-------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-272-SolrDocumentPerformanceTesting.patch
Contains:
* LuceneInputDocument
* changed tests to use this impl (and still pass)
* a simple comparison test (far from a perfect representation)
> SolrDocument performance testing
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-272
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-272
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Test
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Attachments: SOLR-272-SolrDocumentPerformanceTesting.patch
>
>
> In 1.3, we added SolrInputDocument -- a temporary class to hold document information.
There is concern that this may be less then ideal performance-wise.
> To settle some concerns (mine included) I want to compare a few SolrDocument implementations
to make sure we are not doing something crazy.
> I implemented a LuceneInputDocument subclass of SolrInputDocument that stores its values
directly in Lucene Document (rather then a Map<String,Collection>).
> This is a quick test comparing:
> 1. Building documents with SolrInputDocument
> 2. Building documents with LuceneInputDocument (same interface writing directly to Document)
> 3. using DocumentBuilder (solr 1.2, solr 1.1)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
|