lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-135) Restructure / Refactor codebase for shared libraries
Date Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:13:26 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12504156
] 

Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-135:
------------------------------------

> do we want to rework the packages too?

I think now is as good of a time as any.  I agree that having independent jar files with classes
in the same package is less then great.


> on the other hand it does have very HTTP specific error codes in it.
> 

I don't see any problem with HTTP status codes in the base class.  It seems standard enough.
 I think we may want to have multiple error types that overlap with the same HTTP status code
(500)

(Not now, but...) I would like to see typed exceptions so they could be handled differently
-- BadRequestException() etc...

> Restructure / Refactor codebase for shared libraries
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-135
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-135
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-135-RestructureForCommonJar.patch, SOLR-135-RestructureForCommonJar.patch,
SOLR-135-RestructureForCommonJar.patch
>
>
> For SOLR-20 and other java projects, it would be nice to have common code share a codebase
that does not require lucene or junit to compile.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message