Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 47155 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2007 15:03:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2007 15:03:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 10587 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2007 15:03:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 10555 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2007 15:03:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 10546 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2007 15:03:19 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:03:19 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:03:08 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g2so202292nfe for ; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:02:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=t4OdCaXenZsujlomuQa2aNI6X7nXsm3jlrkVbE2tc3Wxf23jOsGzDGWAIeao4vn3KqaVrCWcRb5qskRPYpWLhiVd7w0ZLFWSIN91dqMJNyK012zbW0bkSBoccbWcy2uHO5VDt1Q30jIev5sNqj1VyNiwKSd/gSdUerG+RWmq3BQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=eI2NDeexma3nQAuUHcnC3Oj8SVWXheZWwLj8q6viWLFqdRulk0JVPK7+HMsUTReO6bZKJjvPb0YsoJbmm9j6yeyxnxSi9mtNCx+2gI+MfOicjgXqovAzu/mPfCvxbGQ8dNXwUsCcxaAonLtWArdKzXOeZMgtFCbKVhbXuTiFJMU= Received: by 10.82.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr3661935bud.1173020566888; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:02:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.106.19 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 07:02:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:02:46 -0500 From: "Yonik Seeley" Sender: yseeley@gmail.com To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r514254 - in /lucene/solr/trunk/src/java/org/apache/solr/request: JSONResponseWriter.java TextResponseWriter.java XMLWriter.java In-Reply-To: <176776ee0703032159n1fa5382fp6b799535d74893c5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070303222128.415BB1A981A@eris.apache.org> <176776ee0703032159n1fa5382fp6b799535d74893c5@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: af5c5320a0c8a83b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/4/07, Ryan McKinley wrote: > For the 'luke' patch, i was looking at indexes that don't match the > schema. Rather then throw an error, it just treats the field as a > text - while i think we should have errors while putting things into > the index, it is nice to be able to view any index with solr - even > when the contents don't match the schema. Yes, I agree. It will aid in debugging rather than hindering I think. -Yonik