lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley" <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: solrb releases
Date Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:10:50 GMT
On 1/24/07, Erik Hatcher <erik@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > On 1/24/07, Erik Hatcher <erik@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> >> ...Yonik/Hoss, others - what do you think should be done to make
> >> releases?...
> >
> > If you mean an actual release (defined in [1] as "any publication
> > outside the group of people on the product dev list"), the PMC must
> > vote to approve it, and it must comply with the ASF licensing
> > requirements (LICENSE and NOTICE files, etc). And it should be
> > mirrored, dunno how this would work for Ruby packages? So some
> > bureaucracy would be involved I guess.
> >
> > Release candidates are much more lightweight according to [1]. IIUC,
> > putting up a gem package as you mention fits that definition, so that
> > might be a good way of getting your stuff tested.
>
> Yes, definitely this is a "release candidate".  Thanks for the info.
> I'll review the link you sent and update the codebase with any
> missing pieces, and any other recommendations on this thread before
> "releasing".

I would think we could set up a nightly build to go to
people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/solrb/nightly

and perhaps release candidates could go in

people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/solrb/

-Yonik

Mime
View raw message