lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-73) schema.xml and solrconfig.xml use CNET-internal class names
Date Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:41:21 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73?page=comments#action_12454182 ] 
            
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-73:
----------------------------------

> Full class names are less ambiguous.

But what's the context that one needs to resolve the ambiguity?
I'm not looking at the schema as a wire-up-the-java-classes type of IOC thing, but more like
the configuration file for a *user* that needs to specify how they want things indexed.

> If we want usability for non-programmers, we can't have them editing an XML file.

Well designed XML can be editable by hand IMO.
That's all that we have until someone comes up with a schema-creation GUI.  Given the bugs
and round-trip problems that XML creating GUIs always seem to have, I still prefer to go straight
to the source.

> schema.xml and solrconfig.xml use CNET-internal class names
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-73
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: search
>            Reporter: Walter Underwood
>
> The configuration files in the example directory still use the old CNET-internal class
names, like solr.LRUCache instead of org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache.  This is confusing to
new users and should be fixed before the first release.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message