Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 74947 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2006 23:03:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2006 23:03:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 34223 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2006 23:03:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 34125 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2006 23:03:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 34115 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2006 23:03:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:03:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [204.127.192.84] (HELO rwcrmhc14.comcast.net) (204.127.192.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:03:47 -0700 Received: from [192.168.168.15] (c-71-202-24-246.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[71.202.24.246]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20061010230327m14003siofe>; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:03:27 +0000 Message-ID: <452C26BF.3020308@apache.org> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:03:27 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Is solr scalable with respect to number of documents? References: <747415B5C1AD68419E3CD6679918A5FB4D9100@lngnpvexcp001.legal.regn.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ken Krugler wrote: > RMI is faster than Hadoop RPC [ ... ] Have you benchmarked this? Doug