Return-Path: 
 <solr-dev-return-1092-apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@locus.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68342 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2006 17:49:44 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Sep 2006 17:49:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 18336 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2006 17:49:44 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18320 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2006 17:49:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:solr-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:solr-dev@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18307 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2006 17:49:44 -0000
Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org)
 (140.211.166.84)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:49:44 -0700
Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org
 smtp.mail=hossman_lucene@fucit.org; spf=permerror
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
Received-SPF: error (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain fucit.org from
 169.229.70.167 cause and error)
Received: from ([169.229.70.167:52732] helo=rescomp.berkeley.edu)
	by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1 r(10620)) with ESMTP
	id 21/52-10245-5C448054 for <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org>;
 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:49:58 -0700
Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1007)
	id 723B65B763; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE9F7F403
	for <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: micro-patch: add description to test-reports build target
In-Reply-To: <F31F9965-880A-4CF0-8495-6999BF1F1D8D@ehatchersolutions.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0609131044540.18416@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
References: <f767f0600609130621y63e34b76sb8d101418d8365c9@mail.gmail.com>
 <f767f0600609130624t4e8db437q3777bec36826d8c1@mail.gmail.com>
 <F31F9965-880A-4CF0-8495-6999BF1F1D8D@ehatchersolutions.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


: Since I was already there, I went ahead and committed a description
: for test-reports, and javadoc.  But the "junit" target doesn't need a
: description since "test" is the main testing entry point.

actually, something i've been thinking would be nice is if there was a way
to run the tests and generate the test reports with one target -- even if
the tests fail.  (not currenlty possible because of the fast fail behavior
of ant)

Since "test" is currently just a shell arround "junit"  what if we replace
the dependency on the "junit" target with an <antcall>, preserve the
property of tests.failed, then <antcall> "test-reports" and fail based on
tests.failed ?

people who don't wnat test reports can just run "ant junit" (which we
would want to add a description to in this case)

That should all work fairly well right?

:
: 	Erik
:
:
: On Sep 13, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
:
: > On 9/13/06, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
: >
: >> ...I think the test-reports target is worth a description...
: >
: > Just found out that the junit target also has no description, so it
: > might be on purpose.
: >
: > Still, I think making people aware of automated tests is a Good Thing,
: > so I'd add descriptions to both.
: >
: > -Bertrand
:



-Hoss