: I haven't looked at the patch yet but in terms of the parameters, might
: it make sense to use a group name similar to the highlighter params?
: e.g., facet, facet.fl, facet.query, facet.limit, etc.
:
: Also, now that we have per-field override capability for params, we
: should document which params can be thus overridden (facet.zero,
: facet.limit?)
yeah, limit and zero are the two properties i planed on being per
field-able.
I started with facet, facetQuery and facetField based on the existing
highlight, hightlightFields and highlightFormatterClass ... I suppose it
could be sqitched to "." notation, but it seems like it would be better to
only have one "." in a param name, with the string to the left being the
param and the string to the right being the field name. People ooking at
examples might get confused by "facet.limit=10" thinking "limit" is
field name.
-Hoss
|