Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 28218 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2006 05:32:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2006 05:32:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 74945 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2006 05:32:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 74875 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2006 05:32:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 74866 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2006 05:32:07 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:32:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [169.229.70.167] (HELO rescomp.berkeley.edu) (169.229.70.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:32:05 -0700 Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 8FAA75B76C; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DCF7F403 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:31:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (SOLR-37) Add additional configuration options for Highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <18617618.1153494377362.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <3d2ce8cb0607211113i531ec1c3ja351bccdcc57d61e@mail.gmail.com> <44C12050.4070700@ingenta.com> <3d2ce8cb0607211216i2049aaefl4b54204293a872f4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N : > I think there might be value in providing less explicit Highlighter : > configuration and instead provide a set of intuitive options form : > which we can construct various configurations. : : Sounds good... if we do it well, pretty much no one will need a custom : highlighter. : In the very rare case they did, a custom query handler could always be : a fallback. +1, +1 -Hoss