Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-ruby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51482 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2007 16:18:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2007 16:18:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 91959 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2007 16:18:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-ruby-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91944 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2007 16:18:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ruby-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91930 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2007 16:18:13 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:18:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mriffe@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.185] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:18:03 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1042976nfe for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:17:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=XkivA54JKOxwyGvax2JL1nhIwo8IKOJ3iT7RAY4hgPPpupWL3megorPPZKqwvk/8PkZ4Fq48VoiOX1oX04xPxEdrTaGqVedkJQ3owT3ISzAG3Lt+XeQDiVb7iI0+h+vIVBVHgm+JrpVoWYiCBssxRMDNot8O/NH6M9eyuw/oaOY= Received: by 10.82.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr3077460buf.1171556260817; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.188.10 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:17:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43362a720702150817j1e103686vb6567a81bfbd23b9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:17:40 -0500 From: "Mel Riffe" To: ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solrb renaming In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_81337_6268739.1171556260789" References: <2253C9CD-8B4B-446E-858D-06A14D5FA23F@ehatchersolutions.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_81337_6268739.1171556260789 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1 for solr-ruby Though solr-ruby-client would be more correct it is also too verbose. gem install solr-ruby feels appropriate. -mel On 2/15/07, Coda Hale wrote: > > On 2/15/07, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > solr-ruby > > solr-client > > Either of those seems reasonable. I'm kind of pulling towards > solr-client since -ruby is mostly used for bindings, it seems. > > -- > Coda Hale > http://blog.codahale.com > ------=_Part_81337_6268739.1171556260789--