Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-ruby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47624 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2007 20:03:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2007 20:03:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 35150 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2007 20:03:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-ruby-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 35139 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2007 20:03:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ruby-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 35128 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2007 20:03:02 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:03:02 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of rossfsinger@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.174] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:02:51 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k40so286194ugc for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:02:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=twNDNUv9ClKCDaar5MYJquTlVQEixQy33dbXBo2oQy2q6h8ZtNWxXQDN9lZ89Jbv3I7iOoXTNz8gWcDyuiQgAAk37LTuTP1TcwEO7yl2j6H9STJalrsq1gLuNbChxKPyA7Crr+YQWmQHPFFuucR160HNE0yFqB2aloxUe7gCrVY= Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr3509551buc.1171569740867; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.151.9 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:02:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <23b83f160702151202u624c54ft344ba8f9ed4c1e5b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:02:20 -0500 From: "Ross Singer" Sender: rossfsinger@gmail.com To: ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solrb renaming In-Reply-To: <43629F6D-899F-49F6-B42E-BB2D3C4CC3C1@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2253C9CD-8B4B-446E-858D-06A14D5FA23F@ehatchersolutions.com> <91AA7B89-12DF-48B5-AC3E-92DD234DCEC0@ehatchersolutions.com> <2A3FA182-E6D1-44B5-9AF4-4F3981313125@rectangular.com> <43629F6D-899F-49F6-B42E-BB2D3C4CC3C1@pobox.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7a35a01e7f11541c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/15/07, Edward Summers wrote: > I like solr-ruby. It would follow the pattern of some other gems on > rubyforge: > > gem list -r | grep '\-ruby' Agreed and the ruby community is nothing if fans of convention. -Ross.