From pylucene-dev-return-3038-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Mon Jun 17 15:19:54 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D102D18062B for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:19:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 73013 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2019 15:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact pylucene-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 72993 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2019 15:19:48 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:19:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 61A01C22BF for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:19:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.651 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7BOIN6O_CtMU for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9C04B5F1ED for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id x4so10409426wrt.6 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 08:19:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to :message-id; bh=xDajJO5fs9eCkabB+kJ8/KV0XD6WCvMSdaLAZ3FvC+U=; b=ReS/iRXjmeWENQECmlQJl4DNu23RGnRMltbldOBUDaM2dOHdnv2+Vztcbz+2Wf0UhE ePy3b5nFM4RCImrMs6Z2apnPd3cndmtIQLaCWlkVze+AM8NsrJkR1EdxbRUXAZ8FeAaw wsIjJjMpLV2mcYm4zPHh+YDI31aTLF5/fna3PvuoSBPZhgwPaAmRh/GrP8CqIrFnbob6 FBtc8d8wJ9T825cF8iF0CG6S6kpBx5g/tU1vZaDrR0RJPS2ctTiSnFpDJayX+5Blm1Sz k1IhwZllJ+KuCoa42F70MQNzHVwhHAxgHLJjM9XZpO/2zPGnPRbCIO7hCzxziMtiW1UD KMUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=xDajJO5fs9eCkabB+kJ8/KV0XD6WCvMSdaLAZ3FvC+U=; b=LMhOGhErJ6ixt7FrpzrCR6lkuxDevTNrhn3bbnJRkczXHcmSjVjuutysWjbimVPy3T 5Yldd41rylU+88V4W4n+m+pOY9FIWV27uOKYHdNYZ5C6dWVIKQaYFSPK69rl0JErpz0T Q/1cHk/+sDDTikc79MPVYUjzHiaCq4rbGxWQ7k94zJle0vBadw/afDSQGt5LZFrX11bL n5GT6tuY3nkUVtLXw0DU9nzucOYSWMAjAL02PUc8vgcBnMCQIh61pdvMIvegu3AwwmpF Hbeqvq58WV0nSHqgmz0KS/NcSaCbsMbr/yUl2XM0tMOWgXUK+JlN1Fiyysf3p0tAo/2P KB5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWtaxibCyJOPiQv8gGUt93gzkAWTaeL2VZhywC1r7h0WiUoSPQo yjWfkDfTL5BxoYps+DfkkwF4KaveAKI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzesGFlPplUcna7VDXIdFKwx9infwVzqwsGKxWkxWRGfdpCaAShkWgmeLydY4jNTYQKzTSOZg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6b49:: with SMTP id x9mr61465170wrw.170.1560784782988; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 08:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e34:ec29:9110:154f:52ae:f8f8:6b6b? ([2a01:e34:ec29:9110:154f:52ae:f8f8:6b6b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y16sm9236661wru.28.2019.06.17.08.19.41 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 08:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: David Allouche From: David Allouche Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7087C228-23F8-44D4-8606-9C81FE8A2230" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.1.1 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:19:40 +0200 References: <7C9D76FB-DA50-4042-A090-B903434FF99A@allouche.net> To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <74CD8A25-5A6E-4025-83D2-9971BC8484A5@allouche.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) --Apple-Mail=_7087C228-23F8-44D4-8606-9C81FE8A2230 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thank you, that was very informative. +0 for this release, I builds and pass my test suite. But I was unable to make a complete integration test because I do not = have a proper index format migration infrastructure and my index is made = of incompletely-upgraded lucene6 and lucene7 segments. I will post my questions about index upgrading on = java-user@lucene.apache.org . Regards. > On 11 Jun 2019, at 16:50, Andi Vajda wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On Jun 11, 2019, at 06:30, David Allouche wrote: >>=20 >> This is maybe a silly question, but what is the purpose of this = voting process? >=20 > By the rules of Apache, three PMC binding votes are needed to make a = release. In addition, it's a gauge of general interest in the project. >=20 >> Is this something required by the project governance? >=20 > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > (see "votes on package releases", in particular) >=20 >> What is the meaning of a vote? Does that mean "I am interested", or = does it mean "I have tested the latest trunk and it looks good", or = something else? >=20 > If you find a bug in the release artifacts (not in the latest trunk) = before the release is made, the release is likely to be pulled. >=20 >> What is the typical expected delay for reply? For example, I reserve = Fridays for technical debt management (including upgrading = dependencies), so I cannot typically validate a new PyLucene version in = less than a week. >=20 > A vote must run for at least 72 hours. > Because you are not on the PMC, your vote falls into the "interest = gauging" category, is not binding and is considered "best effort". >=20 >> This is probably all common questions with well documented answers. = If that's the case, then it would be nice to have a link to the answers = in VOTE requests. >=20 > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >=20 > Andi.. >=20 >>=20 >>> On 11 Jun 2019, at 00:39, Andi Vajda wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> The PyLucene 8.1.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of >>> Apache Lucene 8.1.1 is ready. >>>=20 >>> A release candidate is available from: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.1.1-rc1/ >>>=20 >>> PyLucene 8.1.1 is built with JCC 3.5, included in these release = artifacts. >>>=20 >>> JCC 3.5 supports Python 3.3+ (in addition to Python 2.3+). >>> PyLucene may be built with Python 2 or Python 3. >>>=20 >>> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 8.1.1. >>> Anyone interested in this release can and should vote ! >>>=20 >>> Thanks ! >>>=20 >>> Andi.. >>>=20 >>> ps: the KEYS file for PyLucene release signing is at: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lucene/pylucene/KEYS >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/KEYS >>>=20 >>> pps: here is my +1 >>=20 --Apple-Mail=_7087C228-23F8-44D4-8606-9C81FE8A2230--